The threat model, on its own.

A structured threat model of a system or architecture without the full scoring exercise. It fits design reviews and architecture decisions, and it feeds a complete assessment later without rework.

STRIDEOne componentSample
SpoofingCan an actor present as someone they are not?
TamperingCan data or code be altered in place or in transit?
RepudiationCan an action be denied because nothing recorded it?
Information disclosureCan data reach someone who should not see it?
Denial of serviceCan availability be removed by an actor or a fault?
Elevation of privilegeCan a limited actor obtain rights they were not granted?

Every component in scope is taken through all six, then the credible threats are mapped to MITRE ATT&CK techniques.

What triggers this engagement.

A system is being designed or re-architected, and you want the threats understood before anything is built rather than after.

Where the boundary sits.

A scope that is not written down is a scope that grows. Ours is agreed before work starts and it is printed in the report.

In scope
  • Decomposition of the system into components and trust boundaries
  • STRIDE applied to every component in scope
  • Credible threats mapped to MITRE ATT&CK techniques
  • Design-level mitigations tied to each modelled threat
Out of scope
  • Likelihood and impact scoring, which belongs to a full assessment
  • A residual risk position
  • Testing of the built system
What we need
  • Architecture documentation or a whiteboard session with the designers
  • Access to the engineers making the design decisions
  • The stage the design is at, honestly stated
Timeline

Shorter than a full assessment, and set by how many components sit inside the boundary.

What you receive.

One document, layered so that a board and an engineering team can both work from it.

01Component and trust boundary decomposition
02Threat catalogue organised by STRIDE category
03ATT&CK mapping for the threats that warrant it
04Design recommendations tied to specific threats
05A model that a later assessment can score without rebuilding

Is this the right scope for you?

Tell us the decision you are facing. If a different engagement fits better, we will say so before you commit to this one.

Request an assessment